I was just reading the minutes from the Mod section of the convention and read about new classes being proposed: Formula D hydro and runabout? What would be the basis for these classes and motors? I believe Rick Bird proposed it, but know he is going though some tough family matters right now (my best wishes are with ya Rick and your wife!), anyone else know any details???? Just curious.....
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
more mod classes????
Collapse
X
-
The Formula D class proposal was brought to the Mod commission by Brian Palmquist. The commission debated the merits and even tabled the proposal for a time in order to secure input from other members. After much discussion, changes and debate, the commission voted and accepted the proposed class. However, all new classes proposed in APBA must be further approved by the APBA New Class Committee. Here is where the proposal failed. I wasn't in attendance at that committee meeting so I do not know the arguments. Thus, the Formula D is NOT a new class for Mod this year.
John Sharp
Mod Commissioner
-
thanks John......
Originally posted by SPWThe Formula D class proposal was brought to the Mod commission by Brian Palmquist. The commission debated the merits and even tabled the proposal for a time in order to secure input from other members. After much discussion, changes and debate, the commission voted and accepted the proposed class. However, all new classes proposed in APBA must be further approved by the APBA New Class Committee. Here is where the proposal failed. I wasn't in attendance at that committee meeting so I do not know the arguments. Thus, the Formula D is NOT a new class for Mod this year.
John Sharp
Mod CommissionerDaren
DSH/750ccmh/850ccmh
Team Darneille
sigpic
Comment
-
Word choice
Originally posted by mercguythat answers one question I had. The other one was what motors were supposed to be used? I "hear" it was the idea to have a class just for the 44xs Mercs, so they were not disgruntled by the new Tohatsu?
I think the word you're looking for is "obsoleted," not disgruntled.
Mikehauenstein outboard team
186-W * 28-C * 4-T * C-101
Comment
-
The class was to be the 44xs under stock specs. It was a duplicate class and that is why the New Class Committee failed it.Ryan Runne
9-H
Wacusee Speedboats
ryan.runne.4@gmail.com
"Imagination is more important than knowledge"--Albert Einstein
These days, I find it easier to look up to my youngers than my elders.
Comment
-
Dawn to Dark
Already run dawn to dark at a race, stupid to add more classes when we should be combining classes to shorten the day and duplicating already similar speeds.
Who wants a stocker in Mod anyways................... not me.Dave Mason
Just A Boat Racer
Comment
-
Hmmm
I did not miss the point. I just don't want a pure stock race class in Mod. Seem stupid to add classes when everyone already complains we race to long in the day. Why not propose Formual D in stock as a new class ?
And if you are pissed off enough at the D stock rules, hang a set of pipes on your stocker and go Mod. I believe the Tahatsu is already a legal D Mod engine................................ in its stock form. It is also a legal Formula E engine.
In NBRA it is a a legal D mod (40CI) class. Also I believe your 44XS is a legal D Mod engine in NBRA and AOF. So tell me why we need to add another class ?? There are already a ton of options.
At most races here int he Midwest the Mod and stock divisions race together, which makes a long program and a lot of the time there is not enough time to get through the schedule on Sat and we end up going to one heat racing on Sunday, or at the least having a late day Sunday. Look at the USTS, they run off a half day program and can sell it........... and they do not cater to new classes being added very often.......................Dave Mason
Just A Boat Racer
Comment
-
huge advantage!!!
Originally posted by samSteve, you keep saying the Tohatsu shows a huge advantage on the dyno. This is not the case ... it shows a little advantage ... not a "huge" advantage
IN Mike W. words I heard in the SORC phone meeting in easy to understand terms for everyone was that the Tohatsu should have six to seven boat lengths over the Merc out of the corner, that seems huge enough to me.
Regards,Dave Scott
Aim Marine Inc.
613-831-1246 8-5 Mon-Fri
Ottawa, Canada
http://stores.ebay.com/Aim-Outboard-Recyclers
DS(M)H - 20CE
Comment
-
That is huge, you are right. I have serious doubts the dyno charts show that much jump, but if that is what was said at the meeting ... why was it allowed? Are you certain he didn't say 1/6 to 1/7th of a boat length? 6 or 7 boat lengths would be like the Mercs were sitting still ... the power would have to be about triple in comparison to make that much accelleration differenceLast edited by sam; 03-02-2006, 05:21 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by samThat is huge, you are right. I have serious doubts the dyno charts show that much jump, but if that is what was said at the meeting ... why was it allowed? Are you certain he didn't say 1/6 to 1/7th of a boat length? 6 or 7 boat lengths would be like the Mercs were sitting still ... the power would have to be about triple in comparison to make that much accelleration difference
I cannot be sure enough about that. I will call him tomorrow and verify the statement.
Regards,
DaveDave Scott
Aim Marine Inc.
613-831-1246 8-5 Mon-Fri
Ottawa, Canada
http://stores.ebay.com/Aim-Outboard-Recyclers
DS(M)H - 20CE
Comment
Comment