Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

APBA Annual Meeting Agenda

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • APBA Annual Meeting Agenda

    Now's your chance. What do you want done, what should be on the agenda, what shouldn't and this thread is good for Stock, Mod, Pro or J Categories.
    14-H

    "That is NOT why people hate me." - 14-H.

  • #2
    Ok, I will start
    1. the 25 runabout with the Yamato 301/102 over all weight needs to be
    increased. 405 lbs is to light. Needs to go to around 430 lbs.
    2. The tech manual for Yamato 102/302. Its is legal to run a 302 gear
    case on a 102. however, cannot run a 102 gear case on a 302.
    reason, THERE IS NO SPEED ADVANTAGE. ( ask Shannon Bowman)the gear
    case is the same except for the tail cone on the 302 which BTW has no
    measurement. Furthermore, gear case skags are starting to break on the
    102's and even the 302. MY 102's have broken 2 skegs and found severe
    cracks in another 102 and 302 gear case's. Point being I'am at a race and
    I find a bad skeg on my 102. Ok take it off the 302 and I'am ready to
    race, If, however, the bad skeg is on the 302 i cannot use the skeg off
    102. This rule goes back when the fear factor was that the 302 and its
    attaching parts would blow off the 102.
    bill b

    Comment


    • #3
      For Mod why does CMod Runabout Have a Min overall wt of 480 lbs and DMR and FER has no min weight? also why cannot I take a 102/302 and make a nice packaged motor and run DMR with it? or can I.
      bill b

      Comment


      • #4
        I would like the appropriate Stock and Mod comittees to discuss the following two, related issues and put them on a ballot so that all impacted 25 competitors can vote on them:
        1. the carburetor restrictor removed from the Mercury 25XS engine for BOTH 25SSH and 25SSR. It is unlikely that it will matter to most of us if restrictor removal is married to a height restriction (if SORC or safety comittees deem it necessary) just so we don't have to change the **** restrictor between hydro and runabout classes.

        2. the Mercury 25XS engine off "probation" or "prototype" status (or whatever it was last season) to become a fully "legal" engine in 25MOD Hydro

        Ed,
        Thanks for the opportunity to make an "official" request for inclusion on the meeting agenda via Hydroracer.net
        Mike Marshall, Raceboat61-S

        Comment


        • #5
          Course Sizes

          Idea for the agenda:

          Consider specific definitions as to how a race course would be set up as measured using a GPS. 3/4 mile = straights of X lenght and Y bouy turns, 1 mile = XXX, 1 1/4 mile = YYY, etc.

          This would help standardize courses and allow racers to set up boats for specific courses. Also would allow racers to keep track of specific course times and to test toward improving times.

          (I read a similar post by on another boat racing site that suggested such a plan.)
          Last edited by DougMc; 11-02-2005, 07:03 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            sounds like an old song.

            Originally posted by bill boyes
            Ok, I will start
            1. the 25 runabout with the Yamato 301/102 over all weight needs to be
            increased. 405 lbs is to light. Needs to go to around 430 lbs.
            2. The tech manual for Yamato 102/302. Its is legal to run a 302 gear
            case on a 102. however, cannot run a 102 gear case on a 302.
            reason, THERE IS NO SPEED ADVANTAGE. ( ask Shannon Bowman)the gear
            case is the same except for the tail cone on the 302 which BTW has no
            measurement. Furthermore, gear case skags are starting to break on the
            102's and even the 302. MY 102's have broken 2 skegs and found severe
            cracks in another 102 and 302 gear case's. Point being I'am at a race and
            I find a bad skeg on my 102. Ok take it off the 302 and I'am ready to
            race, If, however, the bad skeg is on the 302 i cannot use the skeg off
            102. This rule goes back when the fear factor was that the 302 and its
            attaching parts would blow off the 102.
            Cheaper to keep' er.
            RichardK.C. Mo.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 14-H
              Now's your chance. What do you want done, what should be on the agenda, what shouldn't and this thread is good for Stock, Mod, Pro or J Categories.
              Glutton for punishment, aren't you?
              ...

              OMC FE/SE powerhead parts for sale. Kurcz ported block, Mod 50 pistons and cylinder head, exhaust, etc.



              Comment


              • #8
                Pro

                Let's not limit the number of manufacturers per class and let's encourage innovation, new technology and competition amongst engine manufacturers. Let's strive to have our best competition on the race course and not on the internet. And let us respect the volunteers that try their best to support and move forward our category.

                "Crying, There's no crying in boat racing"
                David Weaver

                Comment


                • #9
                  Nooooo !!!

                  Originally posted by DougMc
                  Idea for the agenda:

                  Consider specific definitions as to how a race course would be set up as measured using a GPS. 3/4 mile = straights of X lenght and Y bouy turns, 1 mile = XXX, 1 1/4 mile = YYY, etc.

                  This would help standardize courses and allow racers to set up boats for specific courses. Also would allow racers to keep track of specific course times and to test toward improving times.

                  (I read a similar post by on another boat racing site that suggested such a plan.)
                  This would work for a record course, but NO to a standerdized race course. One of Region 4's great races is Denton, MD, and lemme tell ya, no way you'd get a 3/4 mile course in that site. Denton is tiny. And Denton has a massive spectator turnout! We usually limit heats to six boats, but one time the ASH kids decided they wanted to run `em all. Ten ASH boats. YOWZAA! Talk about spectator appeal, it was a great freaking race! The ASh drivers pulled into the pits with big grins and roostertail water running outta their helmets. Denton is way cool. Denton ain't even close to a 3/4 mile course.
                  carpetbagger

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We already have these

                    They are called surveyed record courses. We don't need to make non record events tougher on local clubs who already depend volunteers to set up courses etc.


                    Originally posted by DougMc
                    Idea for the agenda:

                    Consider specific definitions as to how a race course would be set up as measured using a GPS. 3/4 mile = straights of X lenght and Y bouy turns, 1 mile = XXX, 1 1/4 mile = YYY, etc.

                    This would help standardize courses and allow racers to set up boats for specific courses. Also would allow racers to keep track of specific course times and to test toward improving times.

                    (I read a similar post by on another boat racing site that suggested such a plan.)
                    Sattler Racing R-15
                    350cc Pro Alcohol Hydro
                    TEAM VRP
                    The Original "Lunatic Fringe"

                    Spokane Appraiser

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Agreed!

                      Originally posted by David Weaver
                      Let's not limit the number of manufacturers per class and let's encourage innovation, new technology and competition amongst engine manufacturers. Let's strive to have our best competition on the race course and not on the internet. And let us respect the volunteers that try their best to support and move forward our category.

                      "Crying, There's no crying in boat racing"

                      Well said David. That's why it's called PRO. Run what ya brung....If you can make something better, go for it
                      Sattler Racing R-15
                      350cc Pro Alcohol Hydro
                      TEAM VRP
                      The Original "Lunatic Fringe"

                      Spokane Appraiser

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It's called Penance

                        Originally posted by David_L6
                        Glutton for punishment, aren't you?
                        I'm a Catholic. What else can I say?
                        14-H

                        "That is NOT why people hate me." - 14-H.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Bill Huson
                          This would work for a record course, but NO to a standerdized race course. One of Region 4's great races is Denton, MD, and lemme tell ya, no way you'd get a 3/4 mile course in that site. Denton is tiny. And Denton has a massive spectator turnout! We usually limit heats to six boats, but one time the ASH kids decided they wanted to run `em all. Ten ASH boats. YOWZAA! Talk about spectator appeal, it was a great freaking race! The ASh drivers pulled into the pits with big grins and roostertail water running outta their helmets. Denton is way cool. Denton ain't even close to a 3/4 mile course.
                          Yes, I wanted to run at Denton, but the old broken leg kind'a got in the way.

                          Measure Denton up with a GPS, add it to my proposal and make it an official course that could be run in other Regions as well.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            1. Set a 5 year plan for a more clear and concise class structure. This should include eliminating smaller classes, or finding ways to grow them(i.e. 25sx and 20 Hot Rod as B Stock class). It should also include what motors will be legal in 5 years, and how long we forsee being able to run them.

                            2. Re-instating minimum class standards. I would propose 40 boats competing nationally, and 12 at the nationals.

                            3. Come up with a permenent process for motor transitions, at least in cases where the SORC decides not to attempt parity. I am of obviously against parity, but it is apparent that the SORC will attempt to achieve it in certain classes. Even if this becomes accepted practice, it will still be only reasonable to leave some classes as single motor classes. For these classes we should have a process for smooth transition from one motor to another.
                            Ryan Runne
                            9-H
                            Wacusee Speedboats
                            ryan.runne.4@gmail.com

                            "Imagination is more important than knowledge"--Albert Einstein

                            These days, I find it easier to look up to my youngers than my elders.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              PRO, Stock, Mod and J

                              I propose all 4 outboard catagories ask the Race Management Committee to reinstate the old start rule where the timing starts when the first legal boat crosses the starting line.

                              Kristi Z-22

                              PRO Commissioner


                              APBA BOD

                              "Ask not what your racing organization can do for you...Ask what you can do for your racing organization"
                              Tomtall 06

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X