Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2010 Stock Class/Engine Structure

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2010 Stock Class/Engine Structure

    Per the new 2010 Stock Outboard Rule Book that is on APBA's website the 2010 Class/Engine Structure is listed as follows:

    ASH/ASR - OMC "A", Mercury "A", Sidewinder 15S (Probationary)

    BSH - Yamato 80, Yamato 302 with 7/16" restrictor, Sidewinder 20S (Probationary)

    BSR - Mercury 25ss, 25XS (no restrictor), Hot Rod 20ci, Yamato 80, Yamato 302 with 9/16 or 1/2" restrictor, Yamato 102 9/16 or 1/2 restrictor, Sidewinder 20S (Probationary)

    CSH/CSR - Yamato 102 & 302

    DSH/DSR - Mercury Mark 55H, 402XS, Mercury /Mariner 44XS, Bass Tohatsu

    15SSH/15SSR - Hot ROd 15ci, Sidewinder 15H

    25SSH - Mercury 25ss, Mercury / Mariner 25xs without restrictor, Hot Rod 20ci

    45SST - OMC 45ss


    So watching and participating in the threads this fall is it correct to assume that the SORC will be asked to;

    1. Approve the Sidewinder 15S in ASH/ASR

    2. Approve the Sidewinder 20S in BSH/BSR

    3. Leave the Mercury "A" as a legal motor in ASH/ASR

    Other:

    4. What other motor changes are up for consideration if any?

    5. Personally I think that both Hydro and Runabout classes with the same letter classification should have the same motors listed as legal, ie BSH / BSR then add 25SSR back in to the class structure. It sure would make it less confusing...

    If these changes go into effect can we ask the SORC to put a 5 year freeze on motor deletions from any class so we can just go race?
    44
    Agree
    61.36%
    27
    Disagree
    38.64%
    17
    444-B now 4-F
    Avatar photo credit - F. Pierce Williams

  • #2
    Originally posted by Howie Nichols View Post
    If these changes go into effect can we ask the SORC to put a 5 year freeze on motor deletions from any class so we can just go race?
    Howie-

    I think this is an important point. Let's lock things down so people can plan for the next 3-5 years. There's a good chance that many of last year’s decisions will be over turned this year. So be it, but nothing prevents this from happening once again in 2011. Different people, different agendas. This is where things get frustrating and taxing on the wallet.

    Comment


    • #3
      Ok Troy, so why did you disagree? With all of it or just a portion of it?

      Not picking on you just trying to see if we can come up with a decent plan to have our Commissioners take to Seattle that they don't have to beat to death for hours. Get it done and move on basically.
      444-B now 4-F
      Avatar photo credit - F. Pierce Williams

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Howie Nichols View Post
        Ok Troy, so why did you disagree? With all of it or just a portion of it?

        Not picking on you just trying to see if we can come up with a decent plan to have our Commissioners take to Seattle that they don't have to beat to death for hours. Get it done and move on basically.
        No problem, really just one part. I don't think there is a need to use a restricted 102 in any of the classes.

        Add: I know this is not a popular opinion but I would also put time tables on some of the dated, no longer manufactured equipment (30+ year old motors). At the very least stop approving aftermarket parts so these things will go away on their own in good time. I'm not here to debate this topic, just responding to your question.
        Last edited by 14J; 11-05-2009, 02:03 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Troy fair enough. Thanks for clearing up your response.
          444-B now 4-F
          Avatar photo credit - F. Pierce Williams

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Howie Nichols View Post
            Troy fair enough. Thanks for clearing up your response.
            almost forgot, I'd also ban the 102 I just sold you

            Comment


            • #7
              I only have one point......APPROVE THE SIDEWINDERS SO THEY CAN SELL SOME MOTORS!!! Greg
              Future J dad!

              Comment


              • #8
                Kinda sorta what we have now except this will mean more boats on the water in BSR, which I personally think is GREAT...

                I would also support Howie's position of keeping 25SSR..either way works for me...and again lets not dump motors by legislation, but attrition
                Roger A 68M
                Team Casual

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Howie Nichols View Post
                  ASH/ASR - OMC "A", Mercury "A", Sidewinder 15S (Probationary)

                  BSH - Yamato 80, Yamato 302 with 7/16" restrictor, Sidewinder 20S (Probationary)

                  BSR - Mercury 25ss, 25XS (no restrictor), Hot Rod 20ci, Yamato 80, Yamato 302 with 9/16 or 1/2" restrictor, Yamato 102 9/16 or 1/2 restrictor, Sidewinder 20S (Probationary)

                  CSH/CSR - Yamato 102 & 302

                  DSH/DSR - Mercury Mark 55H, 402XS, Mercury /Mariner 44XS, Bass Tohatsu

                  15SSH/15SSR - Hot ROd 15ci, Sidewinder 15H

                  25SSH - Mercury 25ss, Mercury / Mariner 25xs without restrictor, Hot Rod 20ci

                  45SST - OMC 45ss

                  Just to clarify the above is what the 2010 Stock Rule book states right now and is what we will be racing next summer.

                  I would also ask that if you disagree with any of this tell us why?

                  Troy - I wouldn't expect anything less...
                  444-B now 4-F
                  Avatar photo credit - F. Pierce Williams

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Gunjumper View Post
                    I only have one point......APPROVE THE SIDEWINDERS SO THEY CAN SELL SOME MOTORS!!! Greg

                    Yes, approve them, but KEEP the restricted 302 in 2O/B.
                    BOPP

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I disagree

                      Anyone really think that restrictor should still be left out of the 25xs in 25ssR?

                      Hearn and Rhodes blew the Yamatos off the water.

                      Talk about a mismatch.



                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Dana
                        25SSR is gone as of Nov 1, 2009 for the 2010 race season. The 25xs is now a legal motor in BSR (along with 6 other motors) and 25SSH.
                        444-B now 4-F
                        Avatar photo credit - F. Pierce Williams

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          OK, how about this...

                          BSH - Yamato 80, Yamato 302 with 7/16" restrictor, Sidewinder 20S (Probationary)

                          BSR - Yamato 80, Yamato 302 with 7/16" restrictor, Sidewinder 20S (Probationary)

                          25SSH -Mercury 25ss, Mercury / Mariner 25xs without restrictor, Hot Rod 20ci

                          25SSR - Mercury 25ss, Mercury / Mariner 25xs without restrictor, Hot Rod 20ci

                          The other classes remain as printed in the 2010 book.
                          444-B now 4-F
                          Avatar photo credit - F. Pierce Williams

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Since the jist of these rules were to get rid of old engines why is the Yamato 80 still in the line up???? Is it not older than the 102???
                            Mike - One of the Montana Boys

                            If it aint fast make it look good



                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by dholt View Post
                              Anyone really think that restrictor should still be left out of the 25xs in 25ssR?

                              Hearn and Rhodes blew the Yamatos off the water.

                              Talk about a mismatch.
                              People say (or used to) that the OSY400/302 was too slow against the 102 Yamato. We run an OSY400/302 and had a good year. I would think the restricted 302 will continue to get more competitive. A west coaster's lap times in 25SSR at Nationals were pretty good during eliminations according to my stop watch and he had just started running the class. I'm sure he'll be faster with time and effort id allowed in BSR. It may not be such a mismatch down the road???? The readily available Yamato 302 and running it restricted really helps to keep the entry numbers up in Region 10 which I assume helps with $ revenue?
                              Last edited by drbyrne55; 11-05-2009, 07:14 PM.
                              BOPP

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X