Dear Fellow Racers:
After reading several comments about the use of specialty (non-competition) straight-a-way boats and attending Devil’s Lake Oregon speed trials last weekend, I have the following observations:
1. There were more entries than in the past because of the new one quarter
mile records
2. Local clubs will financially benefit
3. Racers with competition (non¬¬-kilo) boats have the opportunity to compete
4. More venues can conduct events as they can be held on smaller lakes
5. No need to spend money on specialty boats, and
6. More head-on completion and excitement because everybody has a chance to
set a record
7. The shorter distance lowers the risk of crashes
8. You can run more boats per hour
9. Etc.
I believe that the one quarter mile records should be run with a competition set up (already established). Using competition boats (non-specialty kilo boats) allows everybody to compete.
The issue is differentiating a “kilo” from a “competition” boat. Rather than get hung up in the technicality of the rules, let’s focus on what it is that we want to accomplish, i.e., to allow competition boats to race and disallow specialty designed kilo boats from competing in the one quarter mile. By this I mean no added costs, no lawyers, and no post discussions . . . it is what it is. For example, under the rule, the width of the bottom is already regulated. (The specialty Kilo boats can continue to run in their own class).
My recommendation is to form a committee to establish the minimum criteria for presentation no later than the Reno National meeting in February, 2014. I volunteer to be on the committee or help in any way needed.
One idea is to award more HOC points for Competition than for Kilo quarter mile straight-a-way records.
I look forward to the myriad of feedback this will generate.
Lee Sutter, 28R
After reading several comments about the use of specialty (non-competition) straight-a-way boats and attending Devil’s Lake Oregon speed trials last weekend, I have the following observations:
1. There were more entries than in the past because of the new one quarter
mile records
2. Local clubs will financially benefit
3. Racers with competition (non¬¬-kilo) boats have the opportunity to compete
4. More venues can conduct events as they can be held on smaller lakes
5. No need to spend money on specialty boats, and
6. More head-on completion and excitement because everybody has a chance to
set a record
7. The shorter distance lowers the risk of crashes
8. You can run more boats per hour
9. Etc.
I believe that the one quarter mile records should be run with a competition set up (already established). Using competition boats (non-specialty kilo boats) allows everybody to compete.
The issue is differentiating a “kilo” from a “competition” boat. Rather than get hung up in the technicality of the rules, let’s focus on what it is that we want to accomplish, i.e., to allow competition boats to race and disallow specialty designed kilo boats from competing in the one quarter mile. By this I mean no added costs, no lawyers, and no post discussions . . . it is what it is. For example, under the rule, the width of the bottom is already regulated. (The specialty Kilo boats can continue to run in their own class).
My recommendation is to form a committee to establish the minimum criteria for presentation no later than the Reno National meeting in February, 2014. I volunteer to be on the committee or help in any way needed.
One idea is to award more HOC points for Competition than for Kilo quarter mile straight-a-way records.
I look forward to the myriad of feedback this will generate.
Lee Sutter, 28R
Comment