What are you guys thinking????
This has no reason to waste time at the National Meeting
"With 2 heats, if people jump the gun and others just stay in the back with the hope of people jumping he/she can win when it wasn't deserved,"
WHAT To me it seems that two heats is perfect.
First, it works, and dont screw with something that aint broke. Also, why should nationals work any different from any other boat race, you start saying 3 heats at nationals and people who jum at a regular race will ***** about wanting 3 heats then too.
Lastly as a racer and kind of a purest, it seems to me that you're saying someone who doesnt jump, doesnt deserve the win. To me it seems that part of racing is intelligence, and the fastest guy doesnt deserve to win if hes too stupid to stay legal.
We Have RULES and we have them for a reason, because if somebody jumps the gun that sways the race in their favor, i.e. a "false start" and weather intentional or not, that IS cheating, and deserves disqualification. Having said that, it seems to me that staying legal is part of winning a boat race, and "Deserving" to win a boat race.
I mean, if someone doesnt pass inspection after the first heat, should we say, "oh go get the lead for the 2nd heat and we'll forget about it" NO!! That is essentially what this boils down to. PART OF A WIN IS STAYING LEGAL!!! Proposing this, is like proposing that we should have 3 heats for if someone crashes, just because they're fast. That my friends is just STUPID
-Mike Perman 32-R
(also varsity debator @ my high school)
This has no reason to waste time at the National Meeting
"With 2 heats, if people jump the gun and others just stay in the back with the hope of people jumping he/she can win when it wasn't deserved,"
WHAT To me it seems that two heats is perfect.
First, it works, and dont screw with something that aint broke. Also, why should nationals work any different from any other boat race, you start saying 3 heats at nationals and people who jum at a regular race will ***** about wanting 3 heats then too.
Lastly as a racer and kind of a purest, it seems to me that you're saying someone who doesnt jump, doesnt deserve the win. To me it seems that part of racing is intelligence, and the fastest guy doesnt deserve to win if hes too stupid to stay legal.
We Have RULES and we have them for a reason, because if somebody jumps the gun that sways the race in their favor, i.e. a "false start" and weather intentional or not, that IS cheating, and deserves disqualification. Having said that, it seems to me that staying legal is part of winning a boat race, and "Deserving" to win a boat race.
I mean, if someone doesnt pass inspection after the first heat, should we say, "oh go get the lead for the 2nd heat and we'll forget about it" NO!! That is essentially what this boils down to. PART OF A WIN IS STAYING LEGAL!!! Proposing this, is like proposing that we should have 3 heats for if someone crashes, just because they're fast. That my friends is just STUPID
-Mike Perman 32-R
(also varsity debator @ my high school)
Comment