What's the difference, which is best and why??????
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
102 vs 302?
Collapse
X
-
302 has won CSH at Nationals the past two years in a row. Also, this is the current production motor offered. The 102 is hard to find coils for, and I'm not sure what else. I've heard the 102 gives a little more in the top end. However, I think our 302's here in region 10 have made a pretty good showing against any 102. It would be my recommendation for a 302 over a 102. Also, you have the plus of not having to mess with the points and the timing of the 302. Once its set you don't have to deal with it again.Last edited by seanp3; 09-08-2008, 09:33 PM.Sean Byrne
-
I would tend to agree with Sean. As noted in this thread (post 22), there were several 302s in the CSH finals in addition to the winner. http://www.hydroracer.net/forums/sho...d=13884&page=2
Restricted 302s were 3rd and 4th in 20ss as well, and a 302 won OSY400 at Depue (with a few in the final there as well).
If you're in an area where there are a lot of 102s around, advice on setting timing, and someone with parts who can work on it, that would be a consideration. Also, the 102 still seems to be the strong motor in CSR.
I think there is enough parity now that there isn't really a definitive answer one way or the other. I wish other multi-engine classes were where CSH is now.Mike Johnson
World Headquarters
sigpic
Portland, Oregon
Johnson Racing
Comment
Comment