The Quicker the Inspection....
....the sooner the Happy Hour *s) at Tunk's!!!! Have to keep your priorities straight.
No David (L6) you are not gettig older, only wiser! Since I do not compete in your category, I can only offer comments as a casual observer (but an interested one).
As far as the desire to control costs, I see Modified as having a limited amount of R&D with any one person or team. Then all this collected knowledge seems to dissesminate (spread out) to the other drivers over time (well there may be a few closely held secrets). The great thing with APBA, AOF, NBRA, etc. that I observe is that people are generally willing to share knowledge with their competitiors. This keeps the playing field fairly level with regards to technology. Therefore, people can choose to spend their hard earned dollars experimenting or focusing on incremental improvements (new prop,new boat, lose weight, etc.). Fortunately, there are always some willing to experiment in modified.
I do not care for weights because we race on all types of courses, therefore the impact is inconsistent. Weight impacts acceleration not top-end speed. Added weight also changes the intended handling characteristics of a boat and a fast heavy object hits harder than a fast light object.. At the winter nationals in Alex, the host club will probably set-up a 1 mile or even a 1.25 mile course. The affect of weights will be less dramatic. But on a 3/4 mile course, the impact of extra weight make a big difference. When you have different weight requirements within the same class based on engine manufacturer (C Mod right), the advantage has to change race to race.
Did I mention that, it would be fun to see an open modified class that allows the use of methanol or gasoline? Participation would be solely voluntary!! The PRO division attempted to set-up a class along these lines, but it was just too far away from where the category is today and where it is headed. I think the concept would have a better chance with the Mod division.
....the sooner the Happy Hour *s) at Tunk's!!!! Have to keep your priorities straight.
No David (L6) you are not gettig older, only wiser! Since I do not compete in your category, I can only offer comments as a casual observer (but an interested one).
As far as the desire to control costs, I see Modified as having a limited amount of R&D with any one person or team. Then all this collected knowledge seems to dissesminate (spread out) to the other drivers over time (well there may be a few closely held secrets). The great thing with APBA, AOF, NBRA, etc. that I observe is that people are generally willing to share knowledge with their competitiors. This keeps the playing field fairly level with regards to technology. Therefore, people can choose to spend their hard earned dollars experimenting or focusing on incremental improvements (new prop,new boat, lose weight, etc.). Fortunately, there are always some willing to experiment in modified.
I do not care for weights because we race on all types of courses, therefore the impact is inconsistent. Weight impacts acceleration not top-end speed. Added weight also changes the intended handling characteristics of a boat and a fast heavy object hits harder than a fast light object.. At the winter nationals in Alex, the host club will probably set-up a 1 mile or even a 1.25 mile course. The affect of weights will be less dramatic. But on a 3/4 mile course, the impact of extra weight make a big difference. When you have different weight requirements within the same class based on engine manufacturer (C Mod right), the advantage has to change race to race.
Did I mention that, it would be fun to see an open modified class that allows the use of methanol or gasoline? Participation would be solely voluntary!! The PRO division attempted to set-up a class along these lines, but it was just too far away from where the category is today and where it is headed. I think the concept would have a better chance with the Mod division.
Comment