I think both hydroplane heat start styles have merit given the dominant hull designs being raced. However, I agree that the Euro-designed hydroplane hulls and motors are built purely for jetty or beach starts (long narrow hulls & tunnels, planing shoes, inset motor mounting with deep settings, and small sponson contact surfaces). You can easily "submarine" the front right sponson and nose of a Euro-design hydro performing a slow, right turn while entering the course or milling (been there, done that). I do also agree that the Euro GRM and VRP italian motors are not currently designed to mill - they are designed to only race in full throttle, high rpm conditions with pretty crude carburetors compared to other motor sport racing engines with fuel injection (the GRM 250's don't idle down like some of the Yamatos used to do). I think Bill's comment was appropriate. A swamped hydro usually stops a heat and a flooded motor running in a heat can be a hindrance in the corners to drivers running at high speeds (been there, done that).
I think this start type decision for hydroplane classes should be made entirely by the drivers directly impacted and actively participating in PRO USTS hydro races, and not influenced by spectators to the sport. Change is always hard to adjust to in any sport. If US PRO hydro drivers and owners choose to continue to embrace the Euro hydro hull designs then we need to race them like they were meant and designed to be raced. It's purely a matter of marine "hydro" dynamics (pun intended) and the physics of a modern hydroplane hull's capabilities and characteristics. Yes, if everything goes right with no conflicts in milling a driver can race a Euro hull with a clock start. However, the UIM sequence used to jetty start helps to identify motors that will not run well before the heat begins and allows running the motor for a timed warm-up period before the start of each heat. I was never really skilled at racing the Euro Mostes hull I bought in 2008, but I drove it enough to get a feel of what it would do and what it would not do before and during a heat. That's my 2-cents worth. I hope to race at least one USTS O-250 race next year with my GRM 250cc setup before retirement from boat racing.
Al
I think this start type decision for hydroplane classes should be made entirely by the drivers directly impacted and actively participating in PRO USTS hydro races, and not influenced by spectators to the sport. Change is always hard to adjust to in any sport. If US PRO hydro drivers and owners choose to continue to embrace the Euro hydro hull designs then we need to race them like they were meant and designed to be raced. It's purely a matter of marine "hydro" dynamics (pun intended) and the physics of a modern hydroplane hull's capabilities and characteristics. Yes, if everything goes right with no conflicts in milling a driver can race a Euro hull with a clock start. However, the UIM sequence used to jetty start helps to identify motors that will not run well before the heat begins and allows running the motor for a timed warm-up period before the start of each heat. I was never really skilled at racing the Euro Mostes hull I bought in 2008, but I drove it enough to get a feel of what it would do and what it would not do before and during a heat. That's my 2-cents worth. I hope to race at least one USTS O-250 race next year with my GRM 250cc setup before retirement from boat racing.
Al
Comment