It makes me wonder about this post from my good pal Eddie:
"Interesting that an attempt to buy a way into the Hall of Champions by protesting a non-speed advantage boat violation against a clear winner on the race course was not mentioned in this article about "ethics"."
Since the appeal was an attempt to buy an HOC spot, and the appeal worked, who exactly bought their way into the HOC, was it Pavlick, Pater or you?
If it was none of you guys, then I guess it was just a poorly hatched scheme? If someone spends a grand to get into the HOC and still doesn't get there, that does not speak well for that person. Nice try Lombardo, better luck next time.
"Interesting that an attempt to buy a way into the Hall of Champions by protesting a non-speed advantage boat violation against a clear winner on the race course was not mentioned in this article about "ethics"."
Since the appeal was an attempt to buy an HOC spot, and the appeal worked, who exactly bought their way into the HOC, was it Pavlick, Pater or you?
If it was none of you guys, then I guess it was just a poorly hatched scheme? If someone spends a grand to get into the HOC and still doesn't get there, that does not speak well for that person. Nice try Lombardo, better luck next time.
Comment