If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Found it. It referes to 28" of water column (approx 1 psi) pressure difference across the test piece at the tested air flow.
What is the actual pressure difference across the carb from atmospheric to the lower pressure in the crankcase in the outboard running at 7500 or higher?
Thus the cfm values obtained in the flow test are only relative amounts for comparison at 1 psi pressure drop but not what might be happening thru the engine. But none the less usefull.
"Keep Move'n" life is catching up! No man's life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session.
From the engine parts I have dimensionally measured in my 2 cylindere jobs (Merc and Yamato) the carb has the smallest flow area, next larger flow area is the reed valve opening after the air has left the cage and passing thru the lifted reed and third largest is the reed openings on the top and bottom faces of the cage or reed plate.
The internal flow area of the round reed cage in the Merc is dependent on the cage type and model. The most restricted areas in the cage are the right and left passages from the front to the rear that feed the rear top and bottom reed valves. I have not measured these passages.
Flow testing the cage is a challange due to its internal configuration plus the reeds on the outside. Add to that the rotating crank counter weights and the complications become greater as half the open reeds face the rotating air and the other half are are with the rotating wind.
Would be nice to have a clear engine to see the dynamics of this rotating cyclone in action at 7000+.
"Keep Move'n" life is catching up! No man's life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session.
Comment