I've been experimenting with a few CSR designs ( mainly V hulls), but
lately been playing with some flatbottom designs. My question to you
experts is what is the reason for bottoms being 32-36" wide? Is it for flat turning, speed (more lift), stability? At 60mph you would not think you
need that much width for lift. My current V hull totally lifts out of the water with only 8" of ride surface. An observation of todays CSR designs compared
to the past is that todays designs seem to blowover a lot. I know there are a lot of little tricks such as rocker and aerodynamics that have profound
effects on performance, but I know those are probably locked up
secrets.
My first attempt CSR flatbottom is 27" wide at the transom and so far
it has no handling problems, but race conditions may be another story.
lately been playing with some flatbottom designs. My question to you
experts is what is the reason for bottoms being 32-36" wide? Is it for flat turning, speed (more lift), stability? At 60mph you would not think you
need that much width for lift. My current V hull totally lifts out of the water with only 8" of ride surface. An observation of todays CSR designs compared
to the past is that todays designs seem to blowover a lot. I know there are a lot of little tricks such as rocker and aerodynamics that have profound
effects on performance, but I know those are probably locked up
secrets.
My first attempt CSR flatbottom is 27" wide at the transom and so far
it has no handling problems, but race conditions may be another story.
Comment